Best hemorrhoids treatment tips, check out our hemorrhoids treatment tips and learn how to remove hemorrhoids, with treatments that can be done at home.

What asthma rescue medicine has fewest side effects?

Your humble question:  What are the current inhaled corticosteroids on the market, and what one would be best for me?

My humble answer:  I'm glad you asked this question because I just answered it yesterday over at my asthma blog.  Click here to get your answer.

Your humble question:  Are there any new rescue medicine that have fewer side effects than Albuterol?  I know it's a good asthma medicine, but sometimes it make my grandma very jittery.

My humble answer:  The only other rescue medicine on the market is levalbuterol, which is marketed as Xopenex.  Some studies show that it works better, lasts longer and has fewer side effects as albuterol, yet other studies show that this is nonsense.  However, it's still something you might want to try.  I'm not sure about the inhaler.  But the 0.63 mg solution is supposed to be equivalent to 0.5cc (2.5mg) of albuterol sulfate.
read more...

Are asthmatics smarter than nonasthmatics?


The following is from healthcentral.com/asthma.

"Does asthma make you smarter?"  (originally published on 6/13/11)

So does asthma really make you smarter?  I'm not being facecious either by asking this. In fact, the idea that asthma makes you smarter is one of the aformentioned "Seven Benefits of Asthma."

Asthma certainly can make you smarter!  Right?

I think so.  I surmise asthma forces us to become philosphers of sorts, and philosophers must be perspicacious to see questions others haven't thought to ask such as, "Does Asthma Make You Smarter?"

I'm pondering this idea today because I had a patient recently who was admittedly a hardluck asthmatic.  In fact, she's so hardluck she's become a good friend of mine.

She's admitted for asthma a lot, yet she's quite convivial, and she usually has to set down a book when I enter her room.  It's often our love of stories that sparks a discussion, and usually we become so rapt in some intelligent idea -- often philosophical -- time gets lost, sometimes hours.

She and I also have the asthma link to discuss.

We both love to learn. Her bedside stand usually has a stack of books, and magazines, and newspapers.  She might even have her laptop open to an interesting article, or her Kindle on.

Interestingly enough, one of our recent discussions was about my post about the benefits of having asthma, particularly about how I wrote that asthma can make you smarter.

She liked that idea, and noted asthma has obviously made both of us more astute.  Perhaps near death experiences force one to appreciate and to think uniquely.

Seneca wrote about this 2,000 years ago, back when the most effective asthma medicine was patience.  He wrote how having asthma forced him to find something useful to do with his mind, and he ultimately became a Senator and philosopher.

He wrote, "It is your body, not your mind as well, that is in the grip of ill health.  Hence it may slow the feet of a runner and make the hands of a smith or cobbler less efficient, but if your mind is by habit of an active turn you may still give instruction and advice, listen and learn, inquire and remember, Besides, if you meet sickness in a sensible manner, do you really think you are achieving nothing?"

Now it's not scientifically proven that if you have asthma your brain will somehow magically become bigger and you will somehow develop a higher IQ. Yet it is a proven fact that if you read and think you WILL get smarter.  It happens by default.

In fact, I read once that you have a memory muscle in your brain.  Lack of thinking causes it to atrophy, yet excessive thinking causes this muscle to increase in scope and size, such as when an athlete pumps iron.

Another interesting fact about asthma is it forces you to take a time out.  Often breathing exercises and relaxation exercises are needed to help you ease your mind and catch your breath.

New evidence, as you can see from this study, even shows that mindfulness meditation can help "relieve pain and improve memory by regulating a brain wave known as the alpha rhythm, which 'turns down the volume' on distractions."

While most asthmatics -- including myself -- may not be trained in mindless meditation, I think sometimes we're forced to do something similar to ease our minds and help us cope with our dyspnea.  

Even if my perspicacity is on the wrong track and I'm spurious with the brain wave conception, many asthmatics do tend to read more.  It beats sitting around feeling sorry for yourself when you're brothers are out in the allergy ridden woods chopping down trees.

Regarding this, Seneca wrote, "Leet me tell you, the things that provided me consolidation in those days, telling you to begin with that the thought which brought me this peace of mind had all the effects of medical treatment.  Comforthing thoughts contribute to a person's cure; anything which raises his spirit benefits him physically as well.  It was my Stoic studies that rally saved me.  For the fact I was able to leave my bed and was restored to health I give the credit to philosophy."

Many asthmatics before and since have experienced a similar epiphany.

To delve into a good book is so much more productive, and fun, than to sit around and say, "Oh, woah is me!"

Sure you can ask, "Why me?" Yet those of us with good character take advantage or our down time and we make the best of it.

If you're like me and my good friend -- and Seneca, you'll find something fun to read, or an idea to mull over, or at least some productive hobby to keep you busy. And by default you'll make yourself smarter.

Thoughts? 
read more...

The most basic priority will help you become a better prophet

Every one of us has anxieties in our lives, things that we worry about.  This might be especially true when  we are hit by a recession, or the death of a friend or family, or are having trouble with a child.  We might become so wrapped in our anxiety that we lose sight of the big picture.  We might even blame God for our troubles, or wonder why He'd let such things happen.

Sometimes we become so wrapped up in our own anxieties that we leave God in search of answers somewhere else.  We doubt that He exists.  We feel as though he has abandoned us.  Yet with a little soul searching, we usually find ourselves and, like the child who is away from his parents a long time, we yearn for their return.

Yet the Prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 49: 14-15), when the people of Israel felt anxiety and that God had abandoned them, explained, "Can a woman forget her own child, I will never forget you." 

Likewise, when we feel anxiety, it's usually because we are worrying about things of which we have little control.  We worry how we are to put food on the table, or the best clothing on our children.  I presently worry that the mood changes that have effected my 7 year old after the death of her grandma and great grandma in the same day, might linger and effect the rest of her life.

I worry about my other kids, and my relationship with my best friend.  I worry that I might write something on this blog that might offend my boss and get me in the crap shoot.  I worry, like many do, that I might drop dead in a heart beat and never get to see my kids grow up.

Yet Matthew (Matthew 6 (24-34) writes that we should not be worried about the clothes we wear or the food we eat, "after all, isn't life worth more than food?  And isn't the the body worth more than food?" 

I think this passage might be one of my favorites in the Bible, and perhaps the most humbling.  We sit around worrying about these little things in life that seem so big, yet as Matthew continues on, he explains that these things are always provided for by God, or by God's prophets.  God will either provide these things, or one of his little helpers will come along and provide them for Him for you.

Likewise, he is also saying that there is something more important than anything you do in this life.  There is something you should do before you do any worrying, and even before you do any good deed.  Before you become the prophet of the Lord (which is what we RTs are in a way because we are helping people), you must first reaffirm your relationship with your God.

You must become one with God.  You must reaffirm your values and virtues.  You must think about:


1. love
2. hope
3. justice
4. forgiveness
5. family
6. service
7. compassion
8. truth
9. faith
10.  gratuity
Mother Theresa, before she would do any acts of goodness, would spend three hours in prayer every day.  I wouldn't expect you or me to spend three hours in prayer, yet a moment of prayer in the morning is often all it takes.  A moment in the morning, a moment before (or after) meals, and a moment before bed.

Once we have reaffirmed our faith, once we have reaffirmed our relationship with God (you can use God as a metaphor for the values listed above if you want), once we reaffirm with ourselves what our mission is in this life, once we reassure ourselves of our purpose, then and only then should you do anything else. 

Yet you should not worry or be anxious.  As Matthew explains, "Look at the birds:  they do not plant seeds, gather a harvest and put it in barns: yet your Father in heaven takes care of them!  Aren't you worth much more than birds?  Can any of you live a bit longer by worrying about it?"

The answer is not.  In fact, worrying is proven to take years off your life. Worrying causes ulcers and asthma and all sorts of bad stuff.  Worrying causes many to resort to gluttony.  It causes us to do things that feel pleasant but are unpleasant in the long run. A good example of this is the gluttony of yours truly when his first three children were in the making and were infants.  It was easy to replace anxieties with food and drink.

Yet with the last child he did the opposite.  While his while was pregnant, instead of resorting to gluttony and gaining weight with her, he did the Body for Life.  It was a sacrifice and it was almost unpleasantly hard, yet the pleasures of that hard work are now paying off. 

I remember when I was at National Jewish Hospital in 1985.  The first three months were fine, because I was told I'd be home at the end of three months.  Yet then I was told I would be there another three months after that.  This effected me for the worse.  I refused to talk to anyone.  I became a lost in my own head.  I became utterly depressed.  Then I turned to God and reaffirmed my faith (I wrote about this here).  I became closer to God than I ever had been before.

I think this faith lasted until about the year 2000 when I got my full time job working nights.  I became so rapt in my own desires and my own family and my own self that I lost my way. Thankfully when I lost my way I'm not referring to doing anything terrible.  Yet I felt as though I had lost my relationship with God.  I hated my boss.  I hated my job.  I felt utterly miserable. 

Yet after a while I decided it was time to return home.  I missed the way I felt when I was close to God.  I missed being that person who never cursed or never said anything negative.  I missed being the person everyone looked up to.  So I searched for God, and, as Isaiah wrote so many years ago, God was right there with open arms. 

The neat thing, soon after I started reading the Bible every day and going to church every week, good things started to happen.  Bad things happened in my life, and I didn't feel empty.  I didn't blame God.  My mother in law died and she was only 50, and I was able to cope with it quite well.  I quit complaining at work (I wrote about this here), and the boss soon placed me in a more positive position within the department.  People started looking up to me.  People who used to hate me were now getting along with me. 

I see something similar in my children.  My grandma once said to me that you, as a dad, will be like a got to your children.  I see what she means when I discipline my children.  They hate me for a short time, and then an hour later they are my best friend again.  They yearn for me to be with them. 

Ironically, as the priest was discussing the above, my daughter was throwing a fit in church.  She was refusing to sit and stand properly.  She put her coat over hear head.  When I returned to home I had no choice but to punish her to her room.  Then I found a book of mine (Stephen Kings Full Dark, No Stars), and saw that it had been written on.  It was my daughter's handwriting.  It said, "I don't believe in god"

I usually view book desecration by kids a good thing.  I think it makes the book more valuable.  Yet what she wrote stung.  It made me wonder about what is going on in her head.  Yet then I think back to when I was an anxious kid, and how did I turn out?  I turned out perfectly normal.  God provided a normal life for me, so why not would God provide a normal life for my daughter.

So worry I quit.  And an hour later my daughter was in the living room sitting next to me, giving me a big hug.  She loved me, and I loved her back.  God made us in His image.  As my love for my daughter will never end, God's love for me will never end.  When became lost and decided to be found, he was right there with open arms.

As Matthew continues, "So do not start worrying: 'Where will my food come from? or my drink? or my clothes?  (These are things that the pagans are always worried about). Your father in heaven knows you need all of these things.  Instead, be concerned about everything else with the Kingdom of God and with what he requires of you, and he will provide you with all these other things.  So do not worry about tomorrow, it will have enough worries of its own.  there is not need to add to the troubles each day brings."

We are all here in this life on a mission.  We all have a purpose.  Yet, we must prioritize.  As Paul explains (Corinthians 4: 1-2), "You should think of us as Christ's servants, who have been in charge of god's secret truths.  The one thing required of such a servant is that he be faithful to his master."

So we must re-confirm with ourselves the basics of life and what is important.  We must remember our values.  We must know what our mission on this earth is, and then and only then must we go out in the real world and do what we were born to do.  In my case, I was born to spend time with sick people and blog.  What were you born to do?

Facebook
 Twitter
read more...

Things to tell my great grand kids

I remember TVs with dials and phones with dials and cords.  I remember metal hangers and cars that ran on gas.  I remember when lawnmowers were loud and smelled of gas, and we men loved the smell and the noise. 

I remember when cell phones were called car phones and were large and cumbersome, and the battery pack was stored in the trunk of the car and took up space.  I remember taking typing class in the 10th grade and it was optional. 

I remember the first computers that you pretty much had to write your own programs and they were used pretty much for games that didn't work.  I remember the first video games for home called Atari and we were so excited about it even though the graphics sucked and the games weren't realistic.

I remember being in college and my teacher showing us how to use this thing called email and we kids thinking how stupid and useless it was for us to learn.  I remember in the 1990s seeing commercials for .coms and thinking what a waste of time those commercials were because no one had computers anyway.

I remember not having a computer until 2000 because they were too expensive, and then being excited a few years later when we bought our second one for $200, and we got a big and thin screen to go with it.  I remember in 2011 getting our first laptop and struggling to get used to it at the age of 41.

I remember watching on a black and white TV at school the take off and landing of the first space shuttle flight.  I remember film projectors in class, and I remember we kids were excited when the teacher played the film backwards.

I remember in the 1970s riding a bike and getting my bell bottoms stuck in the spokes. I remember red white and blue socks and short shorts.  I remember getting our first microwave in the mid 1980s and it was huge and had dials and then in the mid 80s renting a VCR so we could watch our first movie rental at home.

I remember tapes and CDs and tape players and CD players and CD/tape players and then disks and flash drives and then learning how to texts on cell phones you didn't have yet but everyone else did.

I remember when we finally splurged to get a VCR and then finally cable was wired to our street in 1987 when I was 17.  I remember this new station called Fox had shows like the Simpsons and Married With Children and kids would talk about these shows.  Later when we got cable we could watch them too.

I remember the pacer that was rejected and ten years later all cars resembled the car that was ahead of it's time.  I remember the 4 wheel drive car the Eagle and Chryslers merger with some German company and the popular Eagle's image was destroyed and the car eventually taken off the market.




Facebook
Twitter Facebook
Twitter
read more...

How to introduce yourself to a patient?

Your humble question:  What is the best way to introduce yourself to a patient and to identify the patient without breaking confidentiality rules?

My humble answer:  There really is no rule how to introduce yourself.  However, due to confidentiality laws (like HIPPA) I find it's best never to say the name of the patient.  My technique is to get the patient to say his or her name so I don't have to.  I usually do the following:
  1. I pick up the written (printed) order and take it with me to the room
  2. I always introduce myself as I enter the room:  "Hi, I'm Rick from respiratory therapy."
  3. Then I say something like, "Will you please say your last name?" 
  4. I confirm the last name with the order and I say the first name of the patient.  Or, if I'm in a humorous mood, I'll say something like, "Yeah, you're right?"  Or I say something like, "Yep, you're the right patient."  You can get creative once you know you have the right patient.
  5. Or... if the patient is unable to communicate you can always check the wrist band, or follow the above procedure with the family member or guardian.
Obviously there's more than one best way to introduce yourself to the patient.  As with anything, every person has his own best practice.

Facebook
Twitter
read more...

It's good that we are here

I've seen death for what it really is.  I've seen the road to death. Yet what impresses me more than anything is when a person who is closing in on the pearly gates is okay by it.  I was reminded of this the other day as I entered the room of a 100-year-old man and he smiled.

He was among the most pleasant patients I've ever had.  His smile was bright and cheery as my 2-year-olds.  His vision of death perhaps the same.  He's obviously seen much, and most of those he has spent his time with are now gone.

Yet here he is sitting in this recliner, most of his teeth dark, his skin cracked and wrinkled, his hair white and barely visible along the sides of his head, yet in the moment he is happy he is here.  He has been humbled like no other man in the hospital.  He has seen more misery.  He has seen more happiness.  He has seen more than the 22-year-old man in the room next to him who was crying and agitated because he had to spend "one more night in this dump."

He spoke little.  He closed his eyes when you weren't speaking to him, and when you spoke he opened his eyes and listened.  I was most impressed by this, considering his old ears could still hear, and his eyes could still see, so long as he had his glasses on.

What more did he have to say.  Most people try to accomplish their goals in life, and to share their stories, by the time the predict they will die (some think they will live forever).  I notice COPD patients are often quite willing to talk and to share their life stories.  I've decided they've come to terms that they will die some day, that they will not escape the grim reaper's grip.

Yet when one is 100 years old, they have accomplished any goals they have set for their life, perhaps several years earlier.  They have shared all their stories.  I've rarely met an 80 year old who believes he has nothing else to offer in this world, yet I believe most of us don't expect to be around at 100.  Few of us will be on the journey this long.  It's a rare feet.

Yet he was happy in the moment.  He was happy he was here.  It sort of reminded me of the story that Matthew told in the Bible about how Peter, James and John see Jesus transfigured, his face white as the sun, as he is talking with Moses and Elijah.  They saw Jesus transfigured on Mount Tabor in all his glory, as he truly is.

So Peter says, "It's good that we are here."  He says this about the moment.  He knows he's going to have many trials and trivializations the rest of his life.  He does, as the Bible tells, reject Jesus three times before Jesus dies.  Yet he is happy in the moment.  He, in essence, has stopped to smell the roses.

Seeing the 100 year old man made me want to stop and re-evaluate my life.  Am I truly happy where I am at?  Or am I like the majority of people who spend their entire lives trying to obtain some goal, perhaps something trivial for material gain, and who fails to enjoy what life offers in every moment?

I do think of this often, and perhaps it's a gift because I have asthma and have been close to death's door a time or two as a kid.  I think often that my 12-year-old will only be living with us five more years, and my parents won't life forever.  And that, perhaps, is why I make sure to go to Florida every winter to visit my parents and go to Disney, even though I'm otherwise frugal with my money.

So in the moment I am happy.  I think of this even as I worked my ass off at work the past two days, perhaps doing the work of two or three RTs, and yet when I arrived at work on Tuesday my boss lectured me about how I need to start picking up after myself, and stop leaving my coffee and water cups lying around. I believe he is not happy he is here.

And after a miserable day at work like that, I go home and hug my kids and roll around the floor with them.  I am happy in the moment.  I am happy I am here.

Do you ever have a moment where you think to yourself, "It's good that we are here?"

Facebook Twitter
read more...

Doctor Lexicon

The Doctor Lexicon:

1. Stupid doctor orders: Doctor Orders written based on habit and with no scientifically proven value; doctor orders that are based on antediluvian theories.

2.  Normal doctor orders:  Doctor Orders written based on scientific evidence

3. Antediluvian theories: Theories that are old and outdated yet are still worshipped by doctors like the hypoxic drive theory.

4.  Regular theories:  Based on a rational guess

5.  Scientific fact:  Proven by science

6. Unfettered Doctor Power: Power doctors were given by people who refuse to question them. Power derived by patients who think doctors know everything. Power obtained because respiratory therapists find it easier to just do what the doctor said as opposed to questioning orders. Power obtained by RT Bosses who choose to place doctors on a higher eschelon than the respiratory therapists they represent. This is how we end up with bronchodilator abuse and stupid doctor orders.

5. Doctor Enabling: 1) Often results from Unfettered Doctor Power. Lack of questioning one person's authority results in that person abusing his power. It results in unnecessary breathing treatments, unnecessary nursing home stays, and other stupid doctor orders, etc. 2) Both patients and medical staff enable doctors to get away with anything they want. This breeds ego.

6. Doctor Ego: When a doctor's head swells to the size of a watermellon because he thinks he knows all and is never questioned by anyone because he has a nasty temper and is feared.

7. Bronchodilator abuse: When doctors order breathing treatments nonscientific reasons; ordering treatments just to cover their bases; ordering treatments just to make sure reimbursement criteria is met; treating all annoying lung sounds and all dyspnea with bronchodilator breathing treatments

8. Elitist Doctors: Doctors who think they are above and beyond every other person. They believe they know it all; Doctor ego; Unfettered Doctor power; Enabling. They have become totalitarian. They are able to do without being questioned. Doctors that haven't been questioned for so long they start to treat people like truck engines on an assembly line instead of as people.

9. Bronchodilator abuse: When doctors order breathing treatments nonscientific reasons; ordering treatments just to cover their bases; ordering treatments just to make sure reimbursement criteria is met; treating all annoying lung sounds and all dyspnea with bronchodilator breathing treatments

10. Covering your bases: 1) The silly idea that simply ordering a breathing treatment so the family thinks you're doing something, you're in the right. That ordering an $80 a pop treatment every four hours you're in the right. 2) Obviously if you throw everything at every patient you're going to hit on something and the patient will eventually get better.

11. Hoaxanex: The belief that Xopenex is somehow stronger and better than Albuterol

12. Hypoxic Drive Hoax: A theory postulated back in the 1930s when RTs were desperate to prove to doctors they were a useful profession. Now that the theory has been debunked we can't get doctors to quit believing in it. It's the belief you need to decrease oxygen when the PO2 is 86% or above. It's an excuse to make doctors not liable for keeping patients in a hypoxic environment. See Faux Confidence.

13. Hypoxic Drive Theory: A theory which states COPD retainers use oxygen as their drive to breathe and not CO2. It's debunked on a daily basis but most doctors don't care. See hypoxic drive hoax.

14.  Respiratory Therapists:  The people doctors call when they don't feel like thinking.

15.  Albuterol:  1)  Something doctors order when they don't know what else to do; It's what's ordered instead of using science.  See covering your bases, bronchodilator.  2)  The cheapest and most common bronchodilator.  A medicine doctors think is the Tylenol for lungs.  Holy water.  Scrubbin-bubbles.

16.  Real Doctor's Creed:  A document doctors vow to uphold in leu of using science in order to make their job easier, cover their bases, and piss off RTs.

17.  Bronchodilator idealists:  Doctors and nurses who believe bronchodilators will lead to world peace and perfect health despite science to the contrary. They will say they have the truth on their side, yet when you tell them to "prove it!" they get all upset and start to quiver in their pants. They do this because they know there is no proof to what they are proposing. There is the history of stupid bronchodilator orders that's for sure, but there is no evidence to back up the reason for all these orders. You'll even see insurance companies allowing breathing treatments to meet admission criteria because some doctor said this is what will help them get better quicker, but there is no real proof to back up that bronchodilators do any good for anything other than (ahem) bronchospasm.

18.  Idealist Doctor:  they believe that a perfect healthcare system where everyone receives equal health care at equal costs, and that all patients will a particular DRG can be treated the same.  They incorporate order sets.  They shun individual thought.  They throw temper tantrums when you question them.  They believe bronchodilators work for all wheezes and dyspnea. Idealists will tell you bronchodilators work for all that wheezes, or for all annoying lung sounds, or for all lung diseases

19.  Realist Doctor:  They understand a perfect healthcare system isn't possible.  They understand you can't treat all patients the same. They understand they don't know everything.  They yearn for teamwork and are willing to give up autonomy for the benefit of the patient.  They write orders based on science and create policies to encourage individual choice such as protocols that allow RTs to made point of care decisions to the benefit of the patient, RT, doctor and hospital.  They understand bronchodilators dilate bronchioles and don't order them on all patients unless the hospital makes them by initiating idealist doctor driven order sets.   The realist at the bedside giving the treatment sees the truth, that the treatment did nothing.

20.  Science:  It's proven to work.  It's based on fact.  Bronchodilators dilate bronchioles is a fact.

21.  Fallacy:  It's not based on science.  It's not a fact.  Bronchodilators will cure all lung ailments and annoying lung sounds is a fallacy.

22.  Malady:  A disease

23.  Myth:  See fallacy.

24.  Bronchodilators: 1)  Broncho - lung air passages.  Dilator = opens up the airway to make air flow through them better.  They relax smooth muscles that are squeezing the bronchiole passages and thus cause these muscles to relax.  Bronchodilators treat bronchospasm.  They relax the air passages.  They dilate the air passages.  2)  The cure for all lung dyspnea and annoying lung sounds.

25.  Tylenol:  Analgesic.  Pain reliever.  Fever reducer.  Doctors think it treats every other ailment too.  When all else fails order Tylenol.  It's the worlds most euphoric medicine.  Ideal medicine.  Cure all.  Holy pill.

26.  Scrubbin Bubbles:  The belief Albuterol will turn into suds and wash all the shit out of the lungs and cure them of all ailments like in that commercial for scrubbin bubbles foaming action.

27. Annoying Lung Sounds:  Sounds doctors and nurses don't like.  Sounds that cause fear and make nurses and doctors worry about the patient.  Any lung noise audible or silent that causes the doctor to require thought.  

28.  Thought:  Call RT

29.  Autonomy:  The yearning for total control.  

30.  Team work:  Giving up autonomy.  Understanding you don't know everything and can't do everything on your own.  It's working together to solve a problem.

31.  Ignorance:  It's what you don't know.  It's not a bad thing so long as you admit what you don't know.  

32.  Bronchodilator lies:  Convincing yourself that bronchodilators treat everything, and every theory that disproves your belief is ignored.

33.   Fake Diagnosis:  So you're scheduled for a pulmonary function test (PFT), yet your diagnosis is diabetes.  The doctor knows most insurance companies only cover PFTs if the diagnosis is COPD, cystic fibrosis, or asthma.  Even though your doctor obviously thinks you need a PFT, your insurance won't cover it unless he lies.  This should explain why on the PFT order form he gave you to take to the hospital it has "asthma" on the line next to diagnosis instead of diabetes.

34.  To cover their asses:  Doctors don't want to be sued, so they order whatever they think is needed so it looks like they did their best.  Much of what we do in the hospital has no medical benefit whatsoever, and the only reason we do it is becasue the doctor wanted to cover his own butt from potential litigation.

35.  Habit
: orders:  Doctors have a set list of things they order for each diagnosis.  After a while he simply writes orders based on habit and may not even know what he wrote.  For example, we have one doctor who orders breathing treatments for all his post operative patients.  I asked him why he writes this order once and he said, "What's a breathing treatment?"  Yet he continues to write the order.  It's for this same reason many foley catheters are inserted into patients and other invasive procedures performed.  Since no one questions the doctor, he has no incentive to update his ordering habits. 

Two basic Types:

1. Gallant Doctor: Gallant Doctor: This doctor knows how to take care of your asthma the right way. He keeps up to date on asthma wisdom, and goes out of his way to make sure you are well educated and on all the best medicines for you. He also works with you on a good Asthma Action Plan, and makes sure you feel comfortable knowing you can call him at any time. He also makes sure you schedule an appointment to see him every six months. Asthmatics who see Gallant doctors have the best chance of having well-controlled asthma. Thankfully, a majority of asthma doctors are this type.

2. Goofus Doctor: Whatever he learned in school umpteen years ago is exactly what he uses to care for you today. He's either too busy, lazy or sometimes simply too arrogant to stay up-to-date on the latest asthma wisdom. He will allow you to walk out of his office with only a rescue inhaler. Asthmatics who have Goofus doctors are Poor Patient Asthmatics who have a tendency to make unscheduled office visits, or trips to the ER, and are often mistaken as Goofus Asthmatics.

Generally, all doctors are either a Goofus or Gallant, but there are sub types of each Asthma doctor personality. Below are all subtypes of the Gallant Asthma Doctor:

1. The Gallants: Strong, Silent Type: She never gets excited, and has a ho hum or gloomy disposition. She often has a finger on her forehead and says, "Hmmm, I wonder..." She is well kempt, organized, jots a lot of notes and knows her stuff. She is very quiet and doesn't like to participate in small talk, but when it comes to asthma or your health she'll talk fluently. She'll assess you thoroughly while remaining taciturn. You might be intimidated by the silence, but she doesn't mean for you to feel uncomfortable. She's very friendly and polite, but also straightforward. She may also ask for your opinion, which may have you wondering if she knows what she's talking about. However, her intention is to involve you in the decision making. She will make sure you are well prepared and cared for upon leaving her office, but once she finishes the job, she will up and leave without shaking your hand or saying good-bye. While she's socially gauche with poor bedside manners, if you like a knowledgeable doc, she's the one for you.

2. Big Hearted Bully: Although he has the bedside manner of a rock and refuses to participate in small talk, he might simply be the best doctor in the world. He is focused and the key for you is to put up with his bluntness and his seeming arrogance. He does not go into detail as he expects you to do your own homework. He usually answers questions with one or two words and, sometimes, he simply grunts. If you annoy him with your petty questions, he'll grimace and moan. If you try to make suggestions, he'll intimidate you with his stare. Yes, you will get a thorough workup and he will take good care of you. If you call him with an asthma concern, he will go out of his way to meet you at the office. He's the only doctor type who will never write a prescription without seeing you first. His decisiveness and stubbornness may impress you, or it may vex you. Overall, if you are the kind of patient who likes a doctor to take control, he's your doc.

3. Columbo: She has a very friendly, nonchalant disposition and quite often has ruffled hair, with an overall disheveled disposition like the 1970s TV detective Columbo (collars up, tie crooked, spot of jelly on white lab coat). When things go wrong she scratches her head with an unreadable expression. She'll slouch in her chair with her legs crossed. She's been known to say things like, "Well, what do you suggest we do today?" Or, "What medicines would you like to try?" When you call her, she's the doc who asks, "Do you think you should come in to see me?" Or, if she meets you in the ER, she may ask, "Do you think you should be admitted?" After a while, you wonder if you are the doctor or if she is. On the other hand, if you are the kind of patient who likes to have more control, this might be the ideal doctor for you.

4. The Buddy: He's the doctor who is often late for your appointments. Even though your irritation level reaches its peak, when he finally does arrive, he cracks a joke you can't help laughing at. He's an amazingly happy person and has a knack for telling stories, especially when you are in an inconvenient position (like on the colonoscopy table, or with your mouth stuffed in the dentist chair). He has a positive disposition and can get you excited even about diseases you might have -- like asthma. He often downplays severity by saying things like, "Oh, you'll be fine," or, "I wouldn't worry about it if I were you." You might catch him saying something goofy like, "Well, today we're going to come up with the perfect concoction to fix you." Yet, if you can tolerate his sunny disposition, you'll participate in an awesome discussion unrelated to asthma. You may actually leave the office feeling like you learned more about his life than about asthma. Despite his quirks, you know he's taking great care of your asthma. So, if you like a friendly, upbeat person, he's your doc.

Along with being a Goofus or a Gallant, each doctor will have one of the following traits:

5.Totolitarian doctors: These are physicians who believe they know what's best for the patient and no one else's opinion matters. They do not like protocols because these allow other members of the care team to make decisions that might not be best for the patient. They do like order sets. These doctors have a tendency to get angry when things don't go their way.

6. Capitalist doctors: These are physicians who know they don't know everything and like to work with a team approach to benefit the patient. They encourage nurses and RTs to make individual decisions at the bedside, and respect the individual opinions and choices of other members of the patient care team. They like guidelines and protocols. These doctors are less likely to get angry because they are more open minded.

7.  Order set doctor:   A doctor who orders everything he can possibly think of.  He fills out every order set possible with the hope that something -- anything -- will work.  He covers all his bases by ordering as many procedures as possible.  Yes there will be duplicate orders and even triplicate orders.  Yes the unit secretary will go bonkers trying to sort it all out, and the nurses and respiratory therapists will snivel about doing all the "useless" stuff.  But that doesn't matter because the theory is that if you throw everything at the patient, something is bound to work. 


9.  Impatient Doctor:  1)   Impatient must have everything done right now, and lacking such promptness he becomes particularly irritable.  (2) A doctor who shares his adrenaline rush in a negative fashion and has everyone up in arms and flustered.  The tasks his co-workers are doing appear to be completed with all thumbs, and this makes progress slow.  The milieu of the room is tense, and even while someone might have an idea to benefit the patient, no one wants to speak because Mr. Impatient is highly critical, easily angered, and constantly says, "Come on!  Come on!"


10.  Patient Doctor:  (1) Peaceful;  ;partially patient and ideologically indulgent.   (2)  A doctor who remains accommodating, calm and composed and he encourages his co-workers to do the best they can.  He's open to ideas and ideas are flowing from one mind to another.  He understands his demeanor of equanimity disseminates a calm and productive milieu.
read more...

Should I worry if I take too much Ventolin at once?

Your question:  I accidentally mixed two amps of albuterol and one amp of duoneb into my nebulizer.  I didnt' realize what I did until I finished the treatment.  Should I be worried?

My humble answer:  You'll be fine.  Albuterol and Duoneb are both safe medicines, even when doubled up like that.  If it makes you feel any better, during my hardluck asthma days I went through an entire albuterol inhaler in a day, more than once.  When patients are sick we often give back to back to back albuterol or duoneb or both treatments.  They are much safer than older bronchodilators, and are very specific to the lungs.  They also work great to end stubborn asthma attacks. 

However, now that I admitted to all that... I have to say that if you need that much Ventolin your asthma is probably out of control and you should seek medical advice.  Surely it's safe to double up on your meds once in a while, or by accident, but if it becomes a regular occurrence there's a greater problem going on. 
read more...

10 tips to gain control of your asthma

The following is from healthcentral.com/asthma.

"How to gain good control of your asthma."  (Originally published 6/20/11)

So you're tired of your asthma controlling you and now you've decided to gain control of your athma.  The question lingering is:  How do I gain control of my asthma?

You'll want to do all of the following:

1.  Call your doctor.  Let him know your concerns.
  • I'm unable to exercise
  • I'm unable to even walk across a room
  • I've been missing too much work
  • I've been using my rescue inhaler every day
  • I feel chest tightness every spring
2.  Work with your doctor and set goals you want to achieve:
  • I want to be able to exercise
  • I want to be able to walk without getting short of breath
  • I don't want to miss any work days/ school days
  • I want to cut back on my rescue inhaler usage
  • I want to make it through a spring without having asthma sypmptoms
3. Your doctor will tweak your medicine regime.  What medicine works best for you may be based on trial and error.  Usually after 40 days on a new medicine you should notice if it's working.

4.  Meet with your doctor again.  Until you and your doctor decide your asthma is controlled, you should meet with him at least every six months. He may tweak your medicine regime until control is met.

5.  Listen to your doctor:  Part of gaining control will be dependent on you trusting and listening to your doctor.  He's the expert.  If he recommends a new asthma medicine, don't be afraid to try it.

6.  Try new medicine:  Give new medicines time to work.  Don't be afraid to give it some time, even if you have some minor side effects.  When I started taking Advair this caused me to tremble.  However, after a few weeks my rescue inhaler use greatly diminished, and the trembling subsided.

7.  Take all your medicine exactly as prescribed:  You will never gain control of your asthma if you're a bad patient.  Be a good boy or girl and take your medicine as your doctor orders.  It may not be easy at first, but soon you'll reap the rewards as your asthma gets better and better.

8.  Take your asthma controller medicine every day, even when you're feeling good:  Medicines like Advair, Symbicort, Singulair, Flovent, and Pulmicort take two to three weeks to get into your system, and work to keep your lungs open.  If you don't take them every day, your asthma may not get better.  If you quit taking them, your asthma may get worse.

9. Learn your asthma triggers and try to avoid them.  If dust triggers your asthma, let someone else do the dusty jobs.  Dust proof your home.  If cigarette smoke triggers your asthma, try to avoid it.  If molds trigger your asthma, get rid of standing water, or paint moldy walls.

10. If your asthma gets worse, let your doctor know right away.  Even if you think your asthma is getting worse, let your doctor know. He may make a tweak here or a tweak there that may make all the difference.

You and your doctor will become an asthma control team, and working with him you should be able to gain good control of your asthma.  It may take some time, yet it can happen.
read more...

It's a democracy, so why are they taking away our asthma choices

Warning!!!! There are people who want to decide for you what is good for you.  They will say that you have a choice.  Yet what they will not tell you is it will be a choice between fewer options.  It will be a sort of control over you, yet you won't even see it, or feel it, or even know it's coming.

These people, many of whom already exist all over the world -- including right here in the good old United States of America -- think most people are not capable of making the right decision for themselves. They believe the American Experiment has failed.

So what is this American Experiment anyway?  Well, allow me to define it:

American Experiment:  Can man rule himself?

The American Dream:  Everyone has a chance to succeed no matter color, creed or station in life.  We are all smart enough to make our own decisions.  We are all smart enough to weigh the rewards against the risks.  We all have an equal opportunity to improve our lot in life.

Then there are two different types of people in this country:

1.  Equal justice:  These are those who believe in the American Dream, and believe the answer to the American experiment is YES.  They believe you are smart enough to rule yourself.  That you, asthmatics, are smart enough to make the right choices no matter how tough.  You are equally smart.  You are intelligent.

2.  Social Justice:  These are those who believe in the American Dream, yet believe the answer to the American Experiment is NO.  They believe you are not smart enough to rule yourself, and therefore not smart enough to make the right choices.  Their experts, therefore, must nudge you in the right direction.  One of the ways to do this is to limit your choices.  You are stupid.

They both call their system of government a democracy (they say this even though we are a republic, not a democracy).  The main difference is in equal justice you are allowed to weigh all your asthma medicines and decide what ones work best for you, and in social justice your choices are limited so you don't make the wrong one.

For the first 160 years of this Nation we were a democracy (republic actually)  run under equal justice, yet ever since about 1895 there have been people by insidious means who have been working hard to change this.  They believe that the Industrial Revolution brought about change in society that would require change in the way society was run.

Today, those who believe in social justice have gained much power not just in America but around the rest of the world.  Hitler ruled by the extreme measures of social justice, and so did Stalin and Mussolini.  Yet what few people know is that the term was coined right her in America during the term of President Woodrow Wilson. 

It has been a slow process.  After early failures they decided it was best to take baby steps.  They slowly worked to change the minds of Americans and those of the rest of the world.  After Wilson, FDR was their next great leader.  While Wilson planted the seeds, FDR created the regulations that allowed those seeds to grow into full, flourishing trees. 

They are trying to create a healthcare system that limits your choices, yet they will tell you otherwise.  They will trick you into believing that you have many choices, yet they know the choices are limited.  You will have fewer doctors to choose from, and fewer health insurance companies.  And you might even have fewer options of how you die and when you die.  Yet you won't know it until it's too late.  They'll just kind of slip by unnoticed.

They have already limited our asthma medicinal choices.  Remember when I wrote this:  Seven Classic Asthma Medicines To Be Discontinued.  The medicines you no longer get to choose from are:  Tilade, Intal, Alupent, Azmacort, Aerobid, Combivent, and Maxair.  You did not decide, they did for you.

These are all your CFC inhalers.  CFC destroys the ozone they say.  The ozone is more important than human life.  You aren't smart enough make and purchase medicines that don't destroy the ozone, so they had to "nudge" you in that direction. The market did not make this choice.  You did not make this choice.

I know you didn't because I read your cries that HFA inhalers don't work as well, or that you want to continue taking Intal and Combivent, medicines that have worked so well to control your asthma, or your COPD, or your cystic fibrosis for years.  You want control.  You want to decide what medicines you take.  Or you want your doctor to decide.

Yet in the new America, the new world, the one where social justice supersedes equal justice, and where you are "nudged" to make the "right" decision, you no longer get to decide.  It doesn't matter what works best for your disease, because the planet is more important than you. 

It doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree with theories that say man is causing global warming and destroying the ozone.  I'm in no way saying I don't respect these theories.  What I'm saying here is the government shouldn't be deciding what's best for you, YOU should be deciding what's best for you.  You are SMART.  Yet they think you are not smart enough to make the right decision.

A few years ago they tried to take away Serevent.   They even tried to take away -- or thought about it -- Advair and Symbicort.  They were scared about these drugs based on the belief that Serevent and Foracort were believed to make asthma worse, or kill asthmatics.

Yet even the FDA says Advair and Symbicort are safe for use, and that the benefits outweigh the risks.  Basically what this means is that your risk of dying of an asthma attack are far greater if you do nothing than if you take Advair and Singulair.  Yet YOU decide.

While I think Primitine Mist is a bad asthma choice, it has been available over the counter for years.  Many ashtmatics live by it.  It's their choice.  Yet recently the FDA banned all CFC over the counter asthma medicines, and any chance these will ever be available OTC again. 

I say they will never be OTC again because Primitine Mist has been on the market so long it was grandfathered in as an OTC medicine.  Yet any new HFA Primitine Mist will have to be prescribed, something no doctor will do.  Therefore it's not worth the investment to make an HFA Primitine Mist.

The market didn't decide this -- they decided it for us.  They had to because they believe we aren't smart enough to make the right decision.  They nudged you so now you have to see your doctor to get the best care.  You SHOULD in my opinion see your doctor and have a Ventolin in my opinion and the opinion of most asthma experts -- yet in a world of equal justice I wouldn't get to decide what's right for you.

More recently some wanted the FDA to ban Singulair  (also check these links).  It didn't matter what you thought.  They decided if you took it you were at an increased risk of suicide.  It didnt' matter there were no scientific studies to show this. 

The FDA did an extensive study on the Sinulair suicide risk, and decided there was no evidence.  They even reported this: FDA concludes there is no Singulair suicide risk.  Yet those who believe in social justice didn't care about the evidence, and there is a big black box warning on Singulair to scare people away from it, and perhaps from getting their asthma under control.

That's what black box warning do, you know, they scare people away from getting their asthma under control. 

Another example is more recent.  As of March 2, 2011 the FDA is ordering companies to stop making and shipping over 500 allergy and cold medicines.  Obviously since these are on the market they were being purchased by people like you, and I never heard one drop of a cry that these medicines were linked to any problems.  So why all of a sudden limit our choices?   Fishy, hey?  At least I think so.

In fact,  according to Web MD, Doctor Harold Nelson of National Jewish Health had this to say about this recent effort by the FDA:
"These are well-recognized drugs that have been used for decades and there is no reason to suspect that there is a risk involved. If there were risks such as hypertension or stroke with oral decongestants, it would be more appropriately addressed by eliminating the ingredient from all products whether those that are grandfathered in, available OTC, or FDA-approved.  These drugs haven’t cleared certain safety hurdles yet, but that doesn’t mean they are unsafe."
New medicines are studied intensely.  The FDA has such a rigorous screening process for approving new medicines that the chance of an unsafe medicine being approved is near zero.  I'm not implying mistakes can't be made.  That doesn't matter to those who believe in social justice:  YOU MUST BE NUDGED.

I'm not implying we shouldn't be careful when taking new medicines -- or old medicines for that matter.  Yet what I am implying is we need to make smart decisions, do our own research, and weigh the advantages with the disadvantages on our own, and not be pushed, bullied or forced into making a "choice" that is not truly democratic.

Yet that seems to be the direction we are going in.  It's scary to me.  I see it.  I hope other asthmatics do too, asthmatics with good, strong voices and pens that are willing to stand up and fight.
 
Facebook
Twitter
read more...

How to deal with anger and public lashings

Anger is something I beleive has no part in any business, with a few exceptions.  For the most part, every member of the team, even people who make mistakes (which is all of us if we're human), should be treated with respect at all times.

Personally I've never received a lashing.  By no means does that mean I haven't made mistakes, because Lord knows I've made every one in the book at least once.  Yet I've been lucky in that way.  Yet many times I've seen my coworkers get a public lashing. 

In fact, just yeasterday I watched as a doctor lashed at a nurse because the nurse made a decision the doctor disaproved of.  The doctor was right in what she was lashing the nurse about, yet the doctor was wrong in the manner to which she dealt with the situation.

Later in the day I pulled said doctor aside.  I wanted to do this in private.  I said, "Dr. Mashing, I don't mean to be disrespectful, but if you treat all your nurses like that no one's going to want to work here."

"I'm sorry, yet I can't have doctors disrespecting my orders like that," she said.  "I need my patients..."

"Look, I think you are in the right there.  My point is that by lashing at a nurse like that, humiliating her in front of all her coworkers, is not a good idea.  If you have a problem you really should deal with it in a more professional manner.  Again, you are right.  I agree with you 100 percent, yet getting angry at that nurse the way you did is not productive at all."

I hated doing that, yet I had to.  Too many times where I work people are afraid to talk to doctors about innapropriate behavior, and nothing ever gets done. If I could count the times I left this job to the powers that be and nothing was ever done -- no waves made -- I'd be retired and rich by now.

So how about a couple definitions:

1.  Anger:  Solves no problems.  Anger means you are assuming you know what's best and accept no other reasoning. 

2.  Lashing:  Pointing out someones flaws or errors in an angry and inappropriate and nonprofessional fashion; intentional public humiliation

So, how do you deal with an angry person
  1. Don't let the person crawl under your skin
  2. Stay silent (keep your lips shut)
  3. Walk away
  4. You can say, "And you have a good day too, and walk away." 
  5. Keep your head held high and take it like a professional
  6. Say yes sir or yes ma'am (if you're not to ticked to speak)
My favorite is #4 because you're letting the person know he's being unprofessional and it gets you out of the room.  I think if someone is humiliating you the best thing to do is walk away.  I don't think anyone has to stay in the room and be humiliated like that.

There are exceptions.  If the person lashing you is your boss, and you're not sure that person will come to his or her senses, then you will have no choice to stand there with your mouth shut. 

After the lashing, make sure you stay away from that person if possible.  Do not think you can discuss anything with that person later thinking you can fix things.  If you have a discussion with her, do it the next day with cooler heads.

Yet if you don't think you can solve the problem by dealing with that person, go to another person, like that person's boss.  Yet more often or not the situation will blow over and you'll never need to mention it except for in a blog post like this. 

Bottom line, anger solves nothing.  It's an absolute waste of time and results in nothing in people losing respect for the person delivering the lashing.  Understand that people make mistakes, and someday you will err too.  Hopefully when you do err you won't get a lashing by one of your peers in a public place.

Facebook
Twitter
read more...

Farting a crime? Smoking not?


So I've confessed before on this blog that breaking wind is something fun to do in the hospital (such as in this post).  You fart and the nurse thinks the patient pooped.  You fart and the patient's family thinks it's the normal smell of a hospital.

We have a little fun like this.  It's fun to silently fart in an elevator.  Or, better yet, it's fun to fart in a crowded room and see how long it takes for you to be standing all alone.  Farting is perhaps the best way to create space for yourself.

Yet in one country farting might become illegal soon -- like this African country.  As the article contends:  "The government of Malawi plan to punish persistent offenders 'who foul the air' in a bid to 'mould responsible and disciplined citizens.'"

Obviously there's public outcry.  How do you prove who did it?   Me and all my brothers would be in jail faster than you could... well, fart.

So someone farts in an elevator.  How do you prove what person did it?  Would it be worth the time, effort and money to find out.  NO!  Farting is a natural part of life.  For some of us it's even fun. 

Plus it would be kind of ironic if farting were to be a crime and smoking not, when second hand smoke has been proven to be harmful and second hand farting merely stinks. 
read more...

Can a respiratory therapist cure all dyspnea

Today we tackle your humble questions:

Your humble question:  Can a respiratory therapist cure all dyspnea?

My humble answer:  Contrary to popular wisdom, a respiratory therapist cannot treat all dyspnea.  What is dyspnea?  It's the feeling of air hunger.  It's the feeling you can't catch your breath.  If it's not caused by bronchospasm, then the respiratory therapist cannot treat it with his magic potion called Albuterol.  If it's CHF dyspnea, or renal failure dyspnea, or metabolic dyspnea or emphysema dyspnea or any dyspnea other than asthma, then a respiratory therapist cannot cure it.  In the case of non bronchospasm, the only remedy is either rest or a call to the physician to resolve the underlying condition.





read more...

The cure for RT apathy is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH

One of the things we have gotten away from in this country is telling people about absolute truths because we are afraid of offending people.  We've gotten away from this in church, courts, school, politics and, you guessed it, the medical field.  The result has lead to many of the problems we face today.

There are two things we are told never to discuss with strangers, and these are religion and politics.  The reason is because we don't want to offend them.  Yet in church, in court, in school, and in politics we should be exploring the truth and teaching about absolute truths.

Yet out of fear of offending someone, we don't do this anymore.  Today we are more interested in keeping the peace than telling the truth.  The reason for this is because the truth can hurt.  And by golly in today's world of political correctness, we are more interested in keeping the peace than teaching truths.

To make matters worse, since we have quit talking about absolute truths, we have become lazy intellectually.  Instead of continuously looking for answers, we settle for what we already know.  And I think there are no better examples of this than right here in the medical field.

For years evidence has been coming out -- and reported right here at the RT Cave -- that the hypoxic drive is real but the hypoxic drive theory is not real.  Evidence supports the idea of giving patients the oxygen they need, and yet doctors continue to underoxygenate COPD patients out of fear they will cause the patent's carbon dioxide to rise and their drive to breathe to become diminished.

Yet in all my years as an RT, I have only seen this happen once.  I've seen CO2 rise slightly, yet that's it.  I have only seen a COPD patient have a syncopal episode following oxygen therapy once.  And he was put on a ventilator and his breathing supported, and he lived on another two years. 

Yet because we RTs are enablers, in that we are more concerned to keep the peace than to risk offending a doctor and stating the truth, this theory continues to be worshiped by many physicians.  Because we are afraid to tell the absolute truth, patients are needlessly suffering.  Because we are afraid to tell the truth, the science world has become lazy in their research because doctors are not pushing for the absolute truth.

Instead, doctors in this country continue to teach and practice based on theories that are older than dirt.  Patients suffer, respiratory therapists and nurses are overworked and burned out (resulting in burnout and apathy), and the entire medical field suffers as a result.  And we RTs and RNs know about the problem and solutions, yet we don't tell the truth because we are afraid of offending physicians.

We need to step up and rise above the fear to educate doctors that bronchodilators treat only a select number of disease processes that result in bronchospasm and not the list of nearly 30 disease process that they order them for. I'm sorry if this makes you made, but Ventolin does not benefit all that wheezes and all that causes shortness of breath. 

Ventolin does not treat inflammation (pneumonia), it does not get into the alveoli (pneumonia and CHF), it does not reduce fluid in your lungs (CHF), it does not treat processes outside the bronchioles (lung cancer, pleural effusion, pulmonary embolus) and it does not treat processes of the upper airway (croup, dry throat), it is not a cure for aging, and it won't prevent death (death rattle). 

Yet speaking these truths may hurt the person you're telling it to.  You Will insult their intelligence.  You may even risk losing respect, and even your job.  You will be called lazy and trying to get out of work.  Yet this is what's needed in the medical field. 

I don't know if you guys know about this, but when Moses escaped Israel, only 20 percent of the Israelites left with him out of fear of the absolute truths that lay out there.  They weren't sure they wanted to make the sacrifice, take the risk of going where no one has gone before.  They were afraid to face the absolute truth. So for this reason only 20 percent of Israelites stood by Mt. Sinai when Moses introduced them to the Ten Commandments.

Yet that's all it took was a small 20 percent to stand up and tell the truth.  All it takes is for a small group to peaceably assemble and say that the medical field is broke and we need to fix it, that we need to find the absolute truths and teach.  We need to put a kingdom of light over the darkness caused by the power of deception.

Related posts:
read more...

Colon Cancer Survival Rate and Life Expectancy


Colon cancer survival rate is an approximate figure that indicates chances of survival of a person detected for cancer of colon and is usually calculated from the point of colon cancer diagnosis. Colon cancer life expectancy is based on various factors and may change from person to person though a general universal figure is taken into consideration before initiating with suitable colon cancer treatment.

Colon Cancer Survival Rate and Life Expectancy in Detail

Colon cancer is one of the highest occurring cancers worldwide and targets both males and females in almost equal numbers. Colon is located very near to bowel and rectum. Colon and rectum cancer together are also known as colorectal cancer or bowel cancer. Cancerous growth in colon needs to be diagnosed and cured well in order to prevent inefficient functioning of bowels.

Colon cancer is more common in people used to high consumption of fat-rich content and red meat. Such contents causes inefficiency in food digestion and also causes obesity in long-term. Breast cancer is the most common form of cancerous disorder in females and leads to many other health issues including colon cancer. Thus, females suffering from cancer of breast should be very alert about their health issues and focus on healthy and active lifestyle.

Colon cancer life expectancy considers various health complications a person might be suffering from. Many people have family history of colon or other kinds of cancerous growth and may be more prone to colon cancer as compared to those without any such history. People having personal background of cancer or cancer treatment have high chances of cancerous growth in colon. Such people usually show low colon cancer life expectancy because their immune system is quite weak to resist cancerous infection developing in colon or other areas. This helps tumors to grow more freely and increase their scope of infection.

Colon cancer survival rate of a victim also depends upon other presence of other health disorders like HPV (Human Papillomavirus), ulcerative colitis, AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome), and inflammatory bowel disease. Such diseases cause healthy tissues present in colon areas to function abruptly and lead to insufficient supply of resources to other adjacent areas. This causes irritation among healthy cells and leads to development of cancerous infection.

Colon cancer life expectancy is closely related to age of the victim. According to latest colon cancer statistics, almost 80% of the cases were detected in people above 65 years of age and very less people under age of 45 years were diagnosed for the disorder. Colon cancer diagnosis in old ages decreases chances of fair survival to a great extent and also creates considerable complications in fair treatment of the victim. Old people tend to suffer from weak immune system and many other health complications that makes it difficult for them to sustain harshness of cancer treatments they undergo thus affecting the chances f survival considerably.

Colon cancer survival rate is quite high in initial stages. Average colon cancer life expectancy stands to more than 90% in the first stage while it comes down to 55-85% in the second stage. Life expectancy for colon cancer is around 20-55% in the third stage while it is less than even 10% in the fourth of last stage. People suffering from colon cancer recurrence tend to show poor survival rate.

Colon cancer survival rate is not universal and may vary from victim to victim depending on the status of his immune system and other health issues he might be suffering from. Healthy diet and active lifestyle helps considerably in better rate of survival. 
read more...

Patient orientated versus task orientated

Sometimes we medical caregivers become so involved in the task that we forget the patient is a real person.  In a way, it's almost as though we are running an assembly line and each patient is simply a part that needs fixing.

Yet patients are real people.  So this means that we have to focus extra hard on getting the task done without compromising the personal experience.  We must always put the patient first and the task second.

Allow for a few definitions:

1.  Patient orientated:  You put the patient first.  You consider the religious and emotional needs of the patient prior to performing any task.

2.  Task orientated:  You put your task first. 

We're often asked to do so much that it's easy to become task orientated.  This is most common in busy patient areas, like the ER.  It's easy to just walk into a room and poke a patient without clearly explaining what you're doing.  You're goal here is to get the task done and quickly move on to the next task.

Yet most patients hate this.  It makes the RN or RT or doctor appear to lack a personality.  You become ruthless, condescending and arrogant.  You may not mean to be this way, but you will by default as a task orientated person.

Surely there are times when being task orientated is necessary, such as when the life of the person is at stake and some swift action is necessary.  Yet more often than not the task must take a back seat to the patient.

Task orientated people tend to get angry when the patient isn't compliant, or when the patient refuses therapy.  I've seen many doctors get mad at such patients. 

A good example is the nurse who comes into the room of a 3 YO little girl and says, "Well, I have a shot.  Will you help me hold her down so we can give it."  Yep.  That's not good.  That's a task orientated person for you.

A people orientated person has more empathy than that.  A good example of a people orientated action was when my reserved 3 YO daughter needed a chest x-ray.  Instead of just expecting my daughter to comply and shooting the x-ray, the lady had my daughter sit upright and she said, "Now look into the little tube.  You'll see the bubble guppies.  All you have to do is hold your breath and..."

Voila.  She got my daughter to sit still while she took the x-ray.

RT Rule #57:  The best caregivers are people orientated first, task orientated second.

read more...

Turn it off at the door

So it's Monday morning and you woke up on the wrong side of the bed.  Or perhaps you're grumpy every Monday morning.  Or perhaps you're always grumpy because it's your personality.  Or perhaps your grumpy because you're sick and tired of people calling you for stupid reasons.

Well it's not my problem.  Don't be grumpy to me because of something that has nothing to do with me.  This brings us to RT Cave Rule # 54:
RT Cave Rule #55:  If you're grumpy, turn it off at the door of the patient's room.
Everybody has days when they are grumpy.  There are days when I'm grumpy.  Yet 99.567% of the time I turn it off at the door to the patient's room.  It's not the patients fault that I'm having a bad day.

I think in any profession you work with people you're going to get sick and tired of people.  I know that in the ER you get so many people who don't need to be there.  You get stupid people taking their kids to the ER for a common cold, and then you have people with truly sick kids who don't follow directions and end up with a kid that's even sicker.

So you get people burn out.  You get stupid people burn out.  Yet it's not my fault.  When my wife calls the doctors office on Monday morning, it' s not her fault you let yourself become grumpy.  So don't take it out on her.  Don't take it out on me.  Don't take it out on the patient.

This brings us to RT Cave Rule #56:
RT Cave Rule #56:  Smile when you're talking on the phone, it will make it easier to be pleasant.
read more...

Dog, cat exposure good for asthmatics?

The following is from healthcentral.com/asthma.

"Having dog or cat may prevent asthma."  (Originally published

Some people think that if you have a family history of cat or dog allergies you should not expose your kids to cats or dogs. The belief is this will prevent cat and dog allergies.

Yet that theory may soon -- if it hasn't been already -- be thown into the large, heaping pile of asthma myths, along with the myth that you grow out of asthma or that asthma is a disease of the mind.

In a recent study researchers followed 565 kids from the ages of birth through age 18, and learned that those kids who were exposed to cats had a 50 percent less chance of developing a cat allergy.  Boys exposed to dogs in the first year of life were likewise 50 percent less likely to develop a dog allergy.

Yet exposure to dogs the first year of life by girls caused no significant change in their risk of developing allergies.  The reason for this remians a mystery.

According to the Washington Post "Study shows early exposure to cats and dogs does not make children allergy-prone," it's not the dog per se that causes allergies, but the dander, and flakes of skin the animal sheds, that cause the allergy response.

These allergens  "get on the skin when the animal licks itself, the substance dries and eventually the skin flakes off. Common symptoms of a pet allergy are sneezing and a runny nose, although some people also have trouble breathing."

Healthcay Reporter Serena Gordon, in "Early Exposure to Pets Won't Up Kids' Allergy Risk: Study," made another important connection, and I have to say I was thinking the same thing when I first read this study

She wrote that this kind of goes along with the hygiene hypothesis which surmises many cases of allergies and asthma are caused because we are overprotective of our kids -- we are too clean.  That exposure to germs while the immune system is developing -- in the first year of life -- makes our immune systems stronger.

Thus, a stronger immune system will be less likely to create antibodies to identify and destroy things that are considered normal -- like cat and dog dander.

Surely this is only one study, yet I have seen other studies that came to the same conclusion.  This might be proof positive that early exposure to cats and dogs will allow our kids to be among the 70 percent of Americans who own a cat or a dog.

Early exposure may allow our kids the opportunity to enjoy these fun animals later in life without being zo zduffy and mizzable.
read more...

God and success

You can disagree with any opinion, yet you cannot disagree with statistics. And every statistic regarding God and success shows that those who believe in God have more successful lives, and have more overall satisfying lives than those who do not believe.

Yes I believe in God. Yet it is also been my belief that even if I did not believe in God I would still raise my children in the world of God; I'd still go to church and have my kids learn about God and Jesus and Christianity. History shows, as the founding fathers new, that individuals function better when they believe in God.

Sure, if you believe in some other God or maybe even the Peanut Butter Ferry or Judas Priest that's fine too. What's important is that kids believe if they are good they will be rewarded in the end of life, and if they are naughty they will be disciplined at the end of their lives.

Likewise, people who are generally good, who live a frugal life and have their priorities in the right place are happier themselves, and they are seen in a more positive light by other people.

I believe this is why the Soviet Union failed, because they tried to get rid of God and religion and churches. The belief here was that in a socialist society, the state is supposed to be the true religion. To benefit all of society, the people are supposed to worship the state. The state knows what's best. The experts in the state know what's best.

It's also why the French Revolution failed, because the french revolution didn't favor the individual, as God would.  God believes all individuals are valuable to a society, including those who disagree with you.  That strong opposing opinions are good for a functioning society.

The French Revolution lead to the bloody slaughter of hundreds because they didn't value the individual.  Those who didn't believe in the revolutionary cause were killed.  It also resulted in the dictator Napoleon.  So as you can see, revolutions don't always result freedom. 

The American Revolution lead to freedom because the founding fathers believed in God, and they believed that the rights of men come from God, and can only be taken away by a government. 

Yet if there's religion, then people will worship the religion. Christianity especially preaches personal freedom, or individual freedom, or individual rights. The Bible preaches that to get to Heaven we must be good on this earth.

People who believe in God live happier lives.  And patients that believe in God are happier patients.  It is my observation that if you have a patient with a life threatening illness, and he or she is in good spirits, chances are that patient is a believer. 

I'm sure that's not always the case, yet as a rule of thumb the most pleasant patients are the ones who believe in God, because just knowing your life will not end when your body expires is somewhat soothing to the mind.

read more...

B2 Buterol

Symptom:  Rapid onset dyspnea

Diagnosis:  Emphysema, pneumothorax

Frequency:  Continuous for one hour

Effect:  If you give the treatment long enough you'll assure there are at least two beta adrenergics sitting on each beta adrenergic receptor. The goal is that once the chest tube is inserted the air will come out twice as fast (b2 = beta *2 or twice the effect)
read more...

History of the fifth vital sign

Back in 1991 I visited the emergency room because my asthma was acting up.  It was my first visit to the ER since I was discharged from my six months stay at the asthma hospital (NJH/NAC) in 1985.  An RT came into my room to give me a breathing treatment and he slipped this thing over my finger.  That was my first exposure to pulse oximetry -- the fifth vital sign.

I had been to emergency rooms many, many times for asthma in my life, and never had I seen such an object.  A temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate check were common, but to slip something that glows red, and causes a red number to appear on this little box the RT held, was something new.

"What is that?" I asked back then.  

The RT attempted an explanation that zoomed over my head.  "It's called a pulse oximeter.  It tells me how well you're oxygenating and gives me your heart rate."  

I wasn't satisfied with that answer.  I wanted to know more.  What was it?  How did it work?  What significance was it?  What did the number 98 mean anyway?  I asked these questions and, once again, the answer wafted over me like a cool breeze.

In the summer of 1993 I was a journalist for a small weekly newspaper.  The local fire department received funding to get a new piece of equipment that was supposed to help them help sick people.  The objects were quite bulky, pretty heavy, and covered by a large, black case.  

A cord loomed from both, and the EMT I was interviewing slipped the probe over my finger.  "This is what we call a pulse oximeter," he said.  He attempted an explanation, yet again the answer flew over my head.  I ended up taking a picture of the EMT holding the new pulse oximeters.  On the caption under I wrote:  "EMT Josh Paramedic is holding two new pulse oximeters purchased with money from a Grant by..."

My next exposure to the 5th vital sign came as an RT student.

What is pulse oximetry

Simply put, pulse oximetry is basically sends two lights through your finger (or ear lobe or toe), through your artery, and then the light is collected by a sensor on the other side of your finger.  The red light you can see, and the infared light you cannot see.

By calculating the amount of infrared light returning to the sensor, the pulse oximeter will tell you what percentage of hemoglobin is carrying oxygen.  Since it's measurement is made by the pulse of arterial blood, it can also give you a heart rate.

A normal pulse oximeter reading is 98%, however, anything greater than 90% is deemed acceptable.  In this way, supplemental oxygen can be administered and adjusted accordingly to maintain an adequate hemoglobin saturation.  The reading is measured as SpO2 (S = saturation, p = pulse oximetry, O2 = oxygen).

How did the pulse oximeter come to be?  

When I was a kid and was having an asthma attack, the respiratory therapist would place a nasal cannula over my face, and I'd promptly proceed to peel it off.  He'd get mad at me saying, "You really need to keep this on.  We need you to get oxygen."

Yet was my oxygen level really low?  The only way to tell would be to either do an invasive arterial blood gas, something that was rarely done on a kid.  I don't recall an ABG being drawn on me until I was at least in my upper teens.

Other than an ABG, the only way to know if a patient was oxygenating well was to use objective measurements such as skin color.  Usually if a person isn't oxygenating well blood will be shunted from fingertips and lips, and these areas will appear grayish or blue.  This is referred to as acrocyanosis, and is not life threatening.  Usually a low dose of oxygen -- say 2lpm -- will be all that's needed to resolve the problem.

If the core of the the body is blue or gray in color, this is referred to as central cyanosis.  Central cyanosis is critical, meaning oxygen isn't getting into that person's body at all, and oxygenated blood -- what little there is -- is shunted directly to vital organs such as the heart, kidneys and lungs.  In these situations, usually large amounts of oxygen are needed to remedy the problem, and perhaps even some form of positive pressure breathing such as from an Ambu-Bag, BiPAP or ventilator.

Obviously if you see cyanosis you know oxygen is needed.  Still, how much oxygen do you give?  When do you taper it off?  And what if the patient isn't oxygenating well yet doesn't show any cyanosis?  What do you do then?  Chances are, in the days prior to pulse oximetry, you winged it.  Some patients got too much oxygen, and some didn't get enough.  Outside of doing an invasive ABG, you really didn't have any means of monitoring and adjusting oxygen.

This was pretty much how it was even up to the early 2000s at some institutions.  Yet then came along the 5th vital sign.  This vital sign -- pulse oximetry -- made the job of respiratory therapists "much easier," notes Gennie Ridlen in her rtmagazine.com article Pulse Oximetry:  A Historical Perspective.

She notes the history of the pulse oximetry can be traced back to 1862:
  • In 1862 Hoppe-Seyler disovered that oxygen was transported by hemoglobin, and he and he referred to the oxygen-hemoglobin compound as oxyhemoglobin
  • In 1864 Stokes proved that oxygen was transported in the blood by hemoglobin
  • In 1862 von Vierodt invented the first pulse oximeter.  He measured oxygen consumption using transmitted light by wrapping a rubber band around his wrist to cut off circulation and shining a light on his hand, he saw the two bands of oxyhemoglobin disappeared and a band of deoxyhemoglobin appeared.  Using reflected light from a spectrometer, he measured the oxygen consumption of the living tissues by noting the time that elapsed as oxyhemoblogin changed into deoxyhemoglobin."
Between 1862 and 1977 the pulse oximeter was improved upon to the point that the first pulse oximeter was marketed in the U.S. in 1977.  The oximeter used a finger probe with fibre optic cables that were very sensitive to motion.

By the late 1970s new probes were invented to solve the problem with motion, and a heart rate tracker was added and the device was precalibrated to make it more accurate.

As with any new discovery in medicine, it took another 10 years for the pulse oximeter to make any real impact in the medical industry.  Interest finally started growing in the early 1980s as the device was determined useful when a patient was sedated to monitor oxygen saturation, and by 1987 it became standard practice on sedated patient, operating rooms, critical care units and emergency rooms. 

The devices continued to improve, and by 1995 you had a choice between bulky bedside monitors and finger probes that could fit into your pocket.
read more...
 
© Copyright New Treatment Ways 2011 - All rights reserved.